Deferred Action Program Revives Debate over Driver’s Licenses for Unauthorized Immigrants
By Muzaffar Chishti and Claire Bergeron
Migration Policy Institute
While Arizona is the only state that has denied driver’s licenses to beneficiaries of the Obama administration’s new deferred action program, officials in Nebraska and Michigan have announced that they will pursue similar policies. (Photo courtesy of David D.) |
|
December 18, 2012
As the number of unauthorized immigrants granted benefits under the Obama administration's recent deferred action program reaches a critical mass, it has rekindled debate over an enduring contentious issue — the role that immigration status should play in the granting of driver’s licenses. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative allows qualified unauthorized immigrants brought to the United States as children to apply for work authorization and protection against deportation. This federal action has had an immediate ripple effect on policy areas which are the province of state authority — for example the granting of driver’s licenses or college tuition at in-state rates — prompting divergent outcomes.
As the DACA initiative took effect on August 15, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer issued an executive order applying specifically to DACA recipients, declaring them ineligible to apply for driver's licenses or any other unspecified "public benefits" in Arizona. On November 29, lawyers representing five DACA recipients denied driver’s licenses under the executive order filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the governor's action. In contrast with the Arizona executive order, lawmakers in Nevada and Illinois are advancing legislation to allow all unauthorized immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses, marking the beginning of a reversal of the strong pushback against such measures in recent years.
The Arizona lawsuit represents immigrant advocates’ opening move in what could potentially be a long legal battle to block state actions that prohibit DACA beneficiaries from receiving driver’s licenses. While Arizona alone has blocked driver’s licenses for this population, officials in Nebraska and Michigan have announced that they will pursue similar policies.
In addition to challenging the constitutionality of Governor Brewer’s action, plaintiffs in the Arizona lawsuit allege that the denial of driver’s licenses will make it "difficult, if not impossible" for DACA recipients to accomplish the "essential aspects of daily life." The lawsuit cites US Census Bureau statistics showing that more than 87 percent of Arizonans (and 86 percent of Americans) commute to work by car.
The eligibility of DACA beneficiaries to qualify for driver's licenses rapidly gained national attention last summer after President Obama announced the new initiative. Under DACA, certain unauthorized immigrants who were brought to the United States as children and meet other criteria are eligible to apply for "deferred action" from the federal government, which gives them two-year protection against removal and enables them to receive work permits and social security numbers. The federal government frequently grants deferred action to various other categories of noncitizens, including victims of human trafficking, spouses and children of lawful permanent residents who are applying for protection under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and applicants for certain types of visas.
While each state sets its own driver’s license policy, most states allow noncitizens who hold work permits or who are granted deferred action to apply for driver’s licenses. On August 15, the same day that US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting applications for DACA benefits, Governor Brewer issued an executive order stating that DACA recipients would not qualify for Arizona driver's licenses since the program did not confer "lawful or authorized status or presence" in the United States, a prerequisite for obtaining a driver’s license under Arizona law. Shortly thereafter, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman and Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson announced that their states would pursue similar policies. Texas Governor Rick Perry also issued a memorandum stating that deferred action under DACA conveys "absolutely no legal status whatsoever" to noncitizens, though the memo did not appear to preclude DACA beneficiaries from applying for driver’s licenses. According to media reports, officials at the Texas Department of Public Safety have stated that DACA beneficiaries will be eligible to apply for driver’s licenses.
The November 29 lawsuit alleges that the Arizona executive order is preempted under federal law, and that it violates the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The suit notes that the executive order stands at odds with prior guidance issued by the state’s Motor Vehicles Division, which established that driver’s license applicants who demonstrated that they had been granted deferred action and a work permit by the federal government would be found to have demonstrated "lawful or authorized status or presence" for the purposes of receiving a license. Thus, under one policy, noncitizens in Arizona who are granted deferred action on non-DACA grounds qualify to receive driver’s licenses, while under the other policy those who are granted deferred action under DACA do not.
Unlike Arizona, Nebraska, and Michigan, a number of states have taken active steps to affirm the eligibility of DACA beneficiaries for driver's licenses. In California, Governor Jerry Brown on September 30 signed into law a bill which expressly states that DACA beneficiaries meet the "lawful presence" requirement for driver’s license eligibility. On October 4, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen sent a letter to the state’s transportation secretary opining that DACA recipients would qualify to apply for driver’s licenses. Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval announced a similar position in November.
Outside the DACA context, the merits of unauthorized immigrants qualifying for driver's licenses have been a subject of active policy debate for a long time. Proponents claim that such measures advance public safety. They argue that work demands frequently require unauthorized immigrants to drive regardless of whether they have licenses, and that granting them licenses only helps ensure that all drivers have passed state safety tests and are insured. Critics, meanwhile, argue that granting driver’s licenses creates a magnet for unauthorized immigrants. In September 2007, New York Governor Eliot Spitzer backed away from a plan to allow unauthorized immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses after igniting a firestorm of criticism.
Since then, the number of states granting driver’s licenses to unauthorized immigrants has steadily declined. While seven states allowed unauthorized immigrants to apply for driver’s licenses in November 2007, just two states — Washington and New Mexico — now do so. One state — Utah — allows unauthorized residents to apply for a restricted "driving privilege card" which authorizes holders to drive, but does not serve as proof of identify for other purposes, such as purchasing a gun or boarding an airplane.
However, this trend may be reversing — helped perhaps by a post-election calculus in both political parties that immigrant-friendly measures may have gained new political currency.
On December 4, the Illinois Senate by a wide margin passed a bill that would qualify unauthorized immigrants to receive specially formatted, three-year, renewable driver’s licenses if they can demonstrate one year of presence in the state. Such licenses would state that they are not to be accepted as proof of identity for nondriving purposes. The bill has yet to come up for a vote in the state’s House of Representatives, but may do so in January.
Lawmakers in Nevada likely also will consider similar legislation in the coming year. In early December, Democratic state Senator Mo Denis announced that he plans to introduce a bill that would allow unauthorized immigrants in that state to receive specially formatted licenses. Reportedly, the new Nevada plan would call for licenses modeled after Utah’s restricted driving privilege cards.
- Find the latest numbers on immigrants granted benefits under DACA.
- Read the complaint filed in the new lawsuit in Arizona.
- Read the October 4 Wisconsin memo.
- Read the text of the California law establishing that DACA beneficiaries may apply for licenses.
- Learn more about which states provide driver’s licenses for DACA beneficiaries from these fact sheets published by the National Immigration Law Center.
USCIS Receives Nearly 368,000 Deferred Action Applications. US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has received 367,903 applications for the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, according to statistics released by the agency in mid-December. Under the program, unauthorized immigrant youths and young adults who arrived in the United States as children and who graduated from US high schools or received their general equivalency development (GED) certificates may qualify for two-year protection against deportation and work authorization. Thus far, 102,965 individuals have been granted deferred action.
- View the new USCIS statistics.
- Learn more about the DACA program in the August 2012 Policy Beat.
Both of the new bills face uphill battles in the Senate, however, where Democrats are in the majority. Though many Senate Democrats support an overall increase in the number of STEM visas, there is broad opposition to the STEM Jobs Act of 2012 because the bill also calls to dismantle the Diversity Visa Program. That program currently grants up to 55,000 lawful permanent resident visas each year to noncitizens from countries that are currently under-represented in US immigration streams. The ACHIEVE Act has been criticized for not placing potential noncitizen beneficiaries on a pathway to citizenship, a feature which critics allege would lock beneficiaries into second-class status.
- Read the text of the STEM Jobs Act of 2012.
- Read the text of the ACHIEVE Act.
- Learn more about the impact of the 2012 elections on immigration policy in the November 2012 Policy Beat.
- Read the new Pew Hispanic Center report.
- Read more about the drop in the unauthorized population in the October 2008 Policy Beat.
- Check out the IRS press release on the new rule.
- Check out the new USCIS web portal.
- Read the new statistics on EB-5 visas.
- Read more about the EB-5 policy in the December 2009 Policy Beat.
- Read more about President Obama's decision to deploy the National Guard to the border in the June 2010 Policy Beat.
- Read the new proposed rules.
- Learn more about immigration detention in the April 2012 Policy Beat.
Colorado Compact Unveiled. A diverse coalition of faith-based groups, immigrant advocates, business leaders, and politicians on both sides of the aisle in Colorado unveiled the "Colorado Compact," a set of six principles which they believe should guide future immigration reform initiatives. The principles include crafting an immigration enforcement strategy that targets serious criminals, creating a visa system that is responsive to the needs of the economy, and offering a "sensible path forward" for unauthorized immigrants who are "of good character" and who agree to pay taxes and become integrated into society. The compact follows similar efforts in Utah, Indiana, and Idaho.
- Read the new Colorado Compact.
- Read the new Secure Communities directive.
- Learn more about Secure Communities in the March 2011 Policy Beat.
If you have questions or comments about this article, contact us at source@migrationpolicy.org
No comments:
Post a Comment