Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Report Finds a Thirty Three Percent Decline In Deportation Filings | Cuéntame | Latino News. Video. Music. Impact

Report Finds a Thirty Three Percent Decline In Deportation Filings | Cuéntame | Latino News. Video. Music. Impact

Report Finds a Thirty Three Percent Decline In Deportation Filings

Feb 28, 2012 // No Comment // Categories: Feature // Tags: , ,, , .

Deportation filings have fallen by 33%. But we still gotta ask – is this relative? In 2011 Obama administration reportedrecord breakingdeportation numbers.

It’s also quite convenient that these numbers come out just before Obama kicks his campaign into high gear.

(Flickr: santiviajero)

via The New American

###

President Obama’s efforts to tighten the leash on U.S. immigration enforcement have caused a sharp drop in the number of deportations, according to a report by the Syracuse University Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. In the last three months of 2011, following the administration’s directive to curb deportations of illegal immigrants without criminal records or who came to the United States as a child or student (among other discretionary factors), deportations have plummeted.

The number of deportation proceedings instituted from October to December 2011 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) plunged to 39,331, a 33-percent decline from the 58,639 filings documented the previous quarter. “Filings are typically lower at this time of year, but even adjusting for this seasonal drop-off and for late reporting,” the report noted, “there appear to have been over 10,000 fewer deportation filings than would have been expected last quarter.”

The chief priority of the administration’s June 17, 2011 directive was to restrict most deportations to those immigrants with criminal records. “It makes no sense to spend our enforcement resources on these low-priority cases when they could be used with more impact on others, including individuals who have been convicted of serious crimes,” Cecilia Muñoz, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, wrote last August in a White House blog post. ”This means more immigration enforcement pressure where it counts the most, and less where it doesn’t,” she added. “That’s the smartest way to follow the law while we stay focused on working with the Congress to fix it.”

However, according to Syracuse University researchers, there is “little evidence” that immigrants with criminal records are representing a higher ratio of overall deportations. In fact, during the purported timeframe, only 1,300, or 3.3 percent, were to be deported as alleged “aggravated felons.” Conversely, from July to September 2011, 3.8 percent were alleged “aggravated felons,” while six months ago the proportion was 4 percent. The researchers added:

An additional 4,193 were charged by ICE for other alleged criminal activity last quarter. When considered together with alleged “aggravated felons,” the proportion of filings in the last quarter seeking deportation on grounds of any alleged criminal activity was still less than one out of seven (14%). And even this small slice is continuing to decline. Two years ago, slightly more than one of six (17.3 percent) were alleged to have engaged in criminal activity as the grounds ICE cited for seeking removal.

“People have heard about these policy changes but largely haven’t seen any difference,” asserted Frank Sharry, executive director of immigration advocacy group America’s Voice.

Many critics have alleged that President Obama’s June 2011 directive was largely political, particularly considering deportations have reached record levels, averaging 400,000 per year, under the current administration. Astoundingly, that’s double the annual average during President Bush’s first term and 30 percent higher than the average when Bush left office. Due to those record numbers, along with Obama’s failure to implement so-called “comprehensive immigration reform,” there has been an ignition of criticism among the Hispanic community — a growing portion of the Democratic voter base.

“Latino immigrant voters know that the Alabama and Arizona laws didn’t come about from Democrats. They’re aware the Obama administration is fighting those laws. They know that Republicans blocked the DREAM Act. They know that Mitt Romney is talking about massive self-deportation,” Sharry said. “And they’re angry and disappointed that the Obama administration promised a legislative breakthrough, didn’t deliver it, but has delivered on record deportations.”

In response, the President has embarked on a political campaign to recover previous support from this pivotal sector of the American electorate.

“What we’ve been able to do is, administratively, we’ve said — let’s reemphasize our focus when it comes to enforcement on criminals and at the borders, and let’s not be focusing our attention on hard-working families who are just trying to make ends meet,” Obama said in an interview last week. “We’ve administratively proposed to reform the ‘three and 10″ program so that families aren’t separated when they’re applying to stay here in this country.”

In emphasizing his newly coined ”five more years” campaign slogan, the President assured a Hispanic audience that he would use his second term to push immigration reform. “My presidency is not over,” Obama indicated, responding to a question about his failure to actualize an immigration bill. “I’ve got another five years coming up. We’re going to get this done.”

Moreover, the President rejected the notion that he broke a campaign promise, while passing the blame to Republicans who were unwilling to embrace any “sensible solutions” on the issue. “So far, we haven’t seen any of the Republican candidates even support immigration reform,” Obama charged, targeting his potential opponents in the upcoming presidential contest.

Political analysts and commentators have predicted that the Hispanic vote will be critical for Obama’s reelection bid, as the minority’s rising population has become an increasingly chief component of the American electorate. While many Hispanics who supported Obama in 2008 may refrain from voting Republican, their disappointment over Obama’s immigration efforts may deter them from even voting at all come November 6.

Considering the persistently stale economy — which has led to a sharp drop in Obama’s approval ratings — the President will rely heavily on minority voting groups, observers predict. As the Los Angeles Timesreported last October, the President has commenced an “all-out push to rebuild his popularity” with Hispanics, which has been “diminished by the weak economy and a lack of progress toward revamping the nation’s immigration system.”

“The excitement isn’t there like it was,” asserted Ana Canales, a volunteer and the county chairwoman for the Democratic Party of Bernalillo County in New Mexico, where the Obama campaign has accelerated efforts to recruit Hispanic voters. “There are a lot of people who are saying, ‘We’re not going to vote.’ We have a lot of work on our hands … to make sure those Latinos understand that he [Obama] is working for us.”

Hope you like MyCuentame - This is your page so LOGIN (It's Free and Easy) and start posting your own articles, videos and stories - If it's good it might just end up in the front page! Don't forget to check us out on facebook:http://facebook.com/cuentame.
Cuentame
  • digg
  • facebook
  • google_buzz
  • reddit
  • stumble
  • twitter
  • print
  • bookmark
  • email

Welcome back! to Cuéntame. Hope you enjoy our page and don't forget to sign up to get our email breaking Update & Alertas. Thanks for coming back, we appreciate it!

Ash Wednesday Pilgrimage...to the EDC 2-22-12 : Wells Fargo Is Not Our F...



Please stand in solidarity with us & sign the petition to stop the expansion of immigration detention in NJ and revoke the ICE contract in Essex County http://www.change.org/petitions/people-not-profits-stop-the-expansion-of-immi...

NEW JERSEY RESIDENTS AND FAITH LEADERS WALKING 12 MILES TO PROTEST PROFITEERING FROM INCARCERATION THAT IS DRIVING IMMIGRATION DETENTION EXPANSION IN NJ

Pilgrims Marched from the Footbridge to Ellis Island in Liberty State Park to the Elizabeth Detention Center for the 3rd Consecutive Year on Ash Wednesday.

Jersey City, NJ- Beginning at 10 am on Wednesday, February 22, members from over two dozen faith based, community and immigrant rights groups, including members from Pax Christi NJ, IRATE & First Friends, American Friends Service Committee Immigrant Rights Program- Newark and NJ Advocates for Immigrant Detainees, gathered in Liberty State Park, just off Freedom Way, in front of the footbridge to Ellis Island for a press conference and prayer service before beginning a 12 mile "pilgrimage" that ended at the Elizabeth Detention Center.

Organizers site their outrage over the history of immigration detention in New Jersey which includes a myriad of cases of abuse, including a number of shocking deaths, a culture of secrecy and a lack of transparency in the county jails and the private detention facilities that now hold over 2000 individuals on any given day, as the driving force behind the event. Adding to their outrage is the fact that the increase in the number and the size of the facilities is being driven by financial concerns rather than human rights. NJ recently became home to a second for-profit facility which incarcerates immigrants who are in immigration court proceedings when the Essex County Executive signed a contract with ICE and the Essex County Freeholders approved a sub-contract for immigration detention with the politically connected firm, Community Education Centers, which operates Delaney Hall.

Participants began with Ellis Island, a powerful symbol of our country's ideals of valuing the contribution of immigrants, and walked between the sites that they say are at the root of the misery caused by the current immigration system and prison privatization. The sites include the Essex County Correctional Facility, the ICE Field Office, and the Wells Fargo branch on Broad Street. Organizers site Wells Fargo's investment in private prisons as the reason for adding the bank branch to this year's route.

Pilgrims witnessed with various faith traditions along the way by stopping at Assumption/All Saints Church, the Al-Ghazaly School, Temple Beth-El and St. Stephan's Grace Community ELCA.

Organizers note that since Essex County signed the contract with ICE to expand immigration detention to 1250 people this past fall, Essex County has been in the news almost constantly with the stories of hardship that immigration detention is causing to local residents and their families.

The pilgrimage was the third annual event of its kind held on the Christian feast day of Ash Wednesday which marks the beginning of the season of Lent, 40 days of penance and repentance that are marked by prayer, abstinence and corporal works of mercy. The theme of this year's event was "For Sandals & Silver". It is a reference to a quote from the book of Amos from the Hebrew scriptures: "Because they hand over the just for silver, and the poor for a pair of sandals; they trample the heads of the destitute into the dust of the earth, and force the lowly out of the way."

The event was co-sponsored by: IRATE & First Friends; Pax Christi NJ; AFSC Immigrant Rights Program - Newark; Wind of the Spirit; Felician Sisters of North America; Casa Esperanza; St. Joseph Social Service Center; Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless; Reformed Church of Highland Park; Passaic County Coalition for Immigrant Rights; Hudson County Brotherhood/Sisterhood Association; Lutheran Office of Governmental Ministry - NJ Synod; NJ Lutheran Immigration Task Force; St. Stephan's Grace Community- ELCA; Sisters of Charity of St. Elizabeth; Franciscan Sisters of Peace; Community Church of NY, Action for Justice Committee; Witness Against Torture; Sisters of St. Joseph of Chestnut Hill; Ironbound Community Corp.; Jornaleros Unidos de Passaic; Action 21; NJ DREAM Act Coalition; Haiti Solidarity Network of the Northeast; Middlesex County Coalition of Immigrant Rights; NJ Advocates for Immigrant Detainees

The facebook event is archived here: http://www.facebook.com/events/119230314865597/

And the press release from which this information was taken is archived here: http://www.facebook.com/notes/irate-first-friends/activists-to-walk-12-miles-...

Friday, February 24, 2012

Ash Wednesday Pilgrimage...to the EDC : Kathy O'Leary On The Politics Of...

Immigrant Steel Workers March Against Unjust Firings | Truthout

Immigrant Steel Workers March Against Unjust Firings | Truthout

by: David Bacon, Truthout | Photo Essay

Pacific Steel workers march through Berkeley. (Photo: David Bacon)

Berkeley, California - Two hundred immigrant workers, their wives, husbands, children and hundreds of supporters marched through downtown Berkeley February 17, protesting their firing from Pacific Steel Castings, one of the city's largest employers. Starting at City Hall, they walked for an hour past stores and homes, as bystanders often applauded. Teachers and students at a Montessori school along the route even came out to the sidewalk to urge them on.

At a rally before the march started, fired worker Jesus Prado told the assembled crowd, "I worked for Pacific Steel for seven years. We've organized this March for Dignity because we want to stop the way they're stepping on us and treating us like criminals. We came here to work, not to break any laws."

"Many of us are buying homes, or have lived in our homes for years," added another fired worker, Ana Castaño. "We have children in the schools. We pay taxes and contribute to our community. What is happening to us is not just and hurts our families. All we did was work. That shouldn't be treated like it's a crime."

Berkeley City Council member Jesse Arreguin agreed. "We're here today to send a message to the Obama administration that the I-9 raids have to stop," he told the crowd.

Two hundred fourteen workers were fired in December and January, as a result of a so-called silent raid, in which the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspected the company's records to find workers who don't have legal immigration status. ICE then demanded that the company fire them, because it said they lacked legal immigration status.

Berkeley City Councilmember Jesse Arreguin speaks to the marchers before they set out. (Photo: David Bacon)

For over a year, these workers have held meetings in union halls and churches, distributed food to families hungry because they can no longer work and spoken to elected officials. The march was the culmination of months of debate in which they weighed the consequences of making their firings public and, therefore, their immigration status as well. "We know Berkeley is a sanctuary city," one worker explained. "This is about the safest place we can think of to do have this march. What happened to us was unjust and we feel we have to protest, if not for ourselves, then for others who face the same injustice."

In fact, thousands of workers have been fired in recent years because of these immigration-related firings. Over a thousand janitors lost jobs in Minneapolis, 2,000 sewing machine operators lost jobs in Los Angeles and many more lost jobs across the country.

Cinthya Muñoz, of Alamed County United to Defend Immigrant Rights, condemns the firings and tells workers the community supports them. (Photo: David Bacon)

Since the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, employers have been prohibited from hiring undocumented workers and workers themselves have been forbidden to hold jobs. To keep track of immigration status, for a quarter-century all workers in the US have had to declare their immigration status on I-9 forms when they get hired. Now, the Obama administration has made the inspection of those forms and the firing of workers who can't show legal immigration status a centerpiece of its immigration enforcement strategy.

Throughout the march, chants and shouts condemned the administration. Activists in the crowd pointed out that President Obama is attacking the communities of immigrants and people of color who were his strongest supporters in his 2008 presidential election campaign. In fact, at the time, Obama promised he would adopt a more humane approach toward immigration enforcement than his predecessor, who became notorious for factory raids and mass deportations. Candidate Obama said he'd work to reform immigration law so that immigrants could enjoy greater rights. Once in office, however, the administration not only continued President Bush's policy of enforcing immigration law in the workplace, but vastly expanded I-9 audits and firings.

A worker holds a sign saying, "We're not criminals! We're workers!" (Photo: David Bacon)

ICE began its audit of the I-9 forms of workers at Pacific Steel last February. In March, the workers and their union, Molders Union Local 164B, struck the plant for a week to turn back company demands in contract negotiations that would have had them pay more for their health coverage. According to legal charges filed at the time by the union, the ICE audit should have stopped at that point, since the agency's own internal rules call for it to avoid any enforcement actions during labor disputes.

The audit, however, continued. At the same time, throughout the following spring and summer, city councils in Berkeley, Oakland and Alameda passed resolutions calling on ICE to abandon it, to allow the workers to continue working and the company to function normally. Similar resolutions and letters poured into the office of DHS Secretary (and former Arizona Gov. ) Janet Napolitano from unions, labor councils, community and immigrant rights organizations and local elected officials.

Workers and supporters brought their children, to dramatize the impact the firings make on families. (Photo: David Bacon)

Nevertheless, in November, ICE sent Pacific Steel a letter listing the names of the 214 individuals it insisted lacked visas, according to its database. If the workers could not provide other valid documents, ICE demanded that the company fire them.

About half the workers live in nearby Richmond and San Pablo. Richmond Mayor Gayle McLaughlin condemned the firings and accused ICE of undermining the city's already devastated economy in the middle of a recession. "Their firing is a violation of their human rights," she said at a local food drive for the workers. "When they say that these raids are targeting criminals, it's not true. People who are just trying to make a living are being targeted big time."

In front of a local Montessori school, staff and students came out to the sidewalk to applaud the marchers. (Photo: David Bacon)

Councilman Arreguin, one of the first elected officials to support the workers last year, added, "The company and the workers pay taxes that support local schools and services. We could lose money we desperately need in these challenging economic times. The workers' paychecks inject hundreds of thousands of dollars into our local economy every month that support other businesses and families. All this is placed in jeopardy by the audit. It is not necessary to enforce immigration law in a way that is so destructive to workers, their families, their employer and our entire community."

Some other public officials, however, attacked the idea that local communities should defend the workers and said the workers were "stealing jobs," despite the fact that many of those fired had worked over a decade in the foundry. Arreguin responded, "An immigration audit leading to the firing of these workers will not create a single job. Instead, it will force them into the underground economy where illegal wages and conditions are prevalent. It will not improve wages and conditions in the foundry. There is already a union contract in place that guarantees healthcare, pensions and wages that can support families."

As the march reached the foundry, workers and supporters showed their anger and frustration over the firings. (Photo: David Bacon)

On the day of the march, the company and union released a joint statement, in which Pacific Steel declared, "These terminations were not only devastating to the workers and their families, but also to the workforce at PSC. The company is proud to have a workforce of extraordinary longevity and skill. Many PSC employees have worked here for decades, earning generous wages and benefits for their hard work and dedication to the company ... [We] implore the protestors to direct their attention to the Department of Homeland Security and federal policy makers."

The union also criticized "the broken and unfair laws used by the government to disrupt and destroy the lives of many of our friends and colleagues."

Metzli Blanco Castaño told marchers about her worries for her own future. (Photo: David Bacon)

The rallies that began and ended the march made the human cost of the firings plain. Metzli Blanco Castaño, the daughter of Ana Castaño and David Herrera, both fired Pacific Steel workers, told supporters of her concern for her own future. "I've lived in the Bay Area my entire life and now I might not be able to stay," she said. Like many others, her parents have exhausted their savings and their home is now in foreclosure.

One of the justifications made by Obama administration officials for the audits is that, if undocumented immigrants cannot work or find other jobs, they'll be forced to leave the country in a process euphemistically called "self-deportation." Yet, among the 214 workers and their families, hardly anyone plans to return to Mexico. "We came because there was no work for us in Mexico and we couldn't survive," said David Herrera, Metzli's father. "That hasn't changed. There's nothing to return to."

The march passed the foundry buildings where the workers used to work. (Photo: David Bacon)

Bill Ong Hing, law professor at the University of San Francisco, says the lack of jobs in Mexico is a consequence of free trade and structural adjustment policies designed to benefit large corporations. He calls the administration's justification divorced from reality. "Employer sanctions [the section of immigration law that prohibits undocumented people from working] have not reduced undocumented migration at all. They've failed because NAFTA [the North American Free Trade Agreement] and globalization create great migration pressure. Trying to discourage workers from coming by arresting them for working without authorization, or trying to prevent them from finding work, is doomed to fail in the face of such economic pressure. To reduce it, we need to change our trade and economic policies so that they don't produce poverty in countries like Mexico."

Rev. Deborah Lee of the Interfaith Coalition for Immigrant Rights called this kind of enforcement a violation of the workers' basic human rights, "These families have done nothing wrong," she said. "They're being punished for working, which is what people in our community are supposed to do. We will not let this happen in silence, nor allow these workers to be treated as though they are invisible."

As hundreds of people filled Second Street, a block away from the foundry where they'd put in their years of labor, the fired workers were certainly not invisible any longer.

Religious leaders and fired workers, like Jesus Prado, placed hearts in a basket to symbolize the idea that the workers are part of the heart of the East Bay community, and pledged to send the hearts in a letter to Homeland Secretary Janet Napollitano. (Photo: David Bacon)



David Bacon

David Bacon is a writer and photographer. His new book, "Illegal People - How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants," was just published by Beacon Press. His photographs and stories can be found at http://dbacon.igc.org.

4 Myths That Led to the NYPD Attack on Muslim Civil Liberties

4 Myths That Led to the NYPD Attack on Muslim Civil Liberties

Daniel Tutt

GET UPDATES FROM Daniel Tutt

4 Myths That Led to the NYPD Attack on Muslim Civil Liberties

Posted: 02/24/2012 10:47 am

Over the last month, multiple scandals have leaked that show the extent to which the NYPD has violated the civil liberties of thousands of New York Muslims under the banner of counterterrorism efforts. Protecting the homeland must remain central in all of our policing and intelligence-gathering efforts, but it should not, and does not have to result in the alienation of hundreds of thousands of New York Muslims. Equally important, counterterrorism efforts must operate on sound and factual analysis of the threat posed by the Muslim community, and collaboration with Muslim community leaders and citizens should be a top priority.

The damage that these scandals have caused in severing the lines of trust between law enforcement and the Muslim community may be irreparable in the short term, but it is not too late for the NYPD to begin assessing the policies that led us to where we are today.

In a recently exposed white paper published by the NYPD entitled, "Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat," we find the basis of an entire philosophy of counterterrorism that led to these scandals, and to the abuse of Muslim civil liberties.

Let's examine each of these myths in turn.

1. Extremist Muslims have permeated New York Muslim communities.

The white paper states:

"New York City has a diverse Muslim population of between 600,000 and 750,000 within a population of about 8 ½ million--about 40% of whom are foreign-born. Unfortunately, extremists who have and continue to sow the seeds of radicalization have permeated the City's Muslim communities."

To suggest that the Muslim community of New York is being overrun with violent extremism is wildly inaccurate. The New York Muslim community makes up an estimated 1 million people throughout the entire state. The community has incredible racial, socioeconomic and ethnic diversity, and is very well integrated into the larger society.

The threat this community poses is similar to the threat that American Muslims pose nationwide: very little to none. The New York Times recognized this a couple weeks ago when they ran an article by the title, "Radical U.S. Muslims Little Threat, Study Says."

Since 9/11, more than 40 percent of the cases where criminal charges were brought upon an American Muslim for suspicion in a terrorism related case, the Muslim community was responsible for turning that individual, or individuals, over to the authorities. Muslims see counterterrorism as their duty according to recent public opinion polls, and they are more concerned about preventing terrorism then are the rest of the non-Muslim American public is per capita. Don't we want to increase this trend of Muslims serving on the front line of counterterrorism efforts? Increasing it has the dual benefit of making Muslims an integral part of the solution, and making them feel like a valued collaborator in the war on terrorism.

According to the Muslim Public Affairs Council's comprehensive terrorism database, of the 49 Muslim domestic and foreign based plots against the U.S. since 9/11 -- there were more than 105 terrorist plots from non-Muslim groups and individuals -- nearly 1 in 3 of these plots were turned over to the authorities by the American Muslim community.

2. A Muslim's level of religiosity is a sign of radicalization and support for terrorism.

The second myth that the document supports is the so called "conveyor belt theory" of terrorism, which argues that terrorism is based on a continuum of religiosity, where the more religious a Muslim gets, the greater likeliness they may adopt violent extremism. This is a major misnomer that has unfortunately been taught to hundreds of thousands of police and intelligence agents nationwide as exposed in a recent investigative report by Political Research Associates entitled Manufacturing the Muslim Menace.

The white paper describes the ideology that supports terrorism as "jihadi-Salafi Islam" but never defines these terms, especially what they mean for Muslims. Instead, they exaggerate what a "Salafi Muslim" is, and neglect to point out that the majority of Salafi Muslims in western Europe and in America are not in favor of using violence and are generally peaceful.

The white paper also refuses to look at competing studies of radicalization. For example, Quintan Wiktorowicz, National Security Agency Director learned in an extensive research project he headed on radicalization of Muslim youth that there is no correlation between religiosity and a willingness to become radicalized. In other words, the more religious Muslims became, the less likely they would be to join radical movements.

Wiktorowicz's insight supports what Policy Analyst Alejandro Beutel of the Muslim Public Affairs Council has recently discovered in his careful analysis of Osama bin Laden's recruitment rhetoric. By analyzing the content of each lecture that bin-Laden gave, Beutel discovered that al Qaeda's recruiting "pitch" was overwhelmingly political/policy-oriented, not religious. It was religion that caused the al Qaeda recruit to stick after they had been lured in by political grievances.

Let's be realistic. The threat from al Qaeda is concerning. Despite the controversial nature of his assassination, Anwar Awlaki's death and disappearance from the scene is a welcoming sign in the ongoing recruitment that al Qaeda is attempting, mainly online,of American Muslims. The fact that we no longer have a charismatic, English speaking figurehead of al Qaeda to brainwash American Muslims to commit acts of violence is a great thing. Awlaki's model turned about two-dozen American Muslims toward a commitment to violent radicalization against the west and American in particular. Importantly, this was happening in anonymous chat rooms online, not in mosques, or mainstream religious institutions in America, further proof that the threat does not come from mosques, community centers, etc.

3. Profiling Muslims is possible and necessary.

The third myth that the white paper supports is that Muslims must be profiled; suggesting not only is it necessary, but that it is possible. Here is an excerpt from the paper:

"Radicalization makes little noise. It borders on areas protected by the First and Fourth Amendments. It takes place over a long period of time. It therefore does not lend itself to a traditional criminal investigations approach."

When we analyze the homegrown cases of Muslim terrorists since 9/11, we find vastly different ethnic origin, age, ideological affiliation and motivations. This makes the very notion of profiling the Muslim community nearly impossible. The idea of profiling based on religiosity or the outward expression of religiosity is just plain wrong and nonsensical as it goes against what we know of terrorism recruits more generally. Like we saw from Wiktorowicz's research, religious Muslims should be seen as allies, as there is no empirical relationship between religiosity and support for terrorism.

4. Muslim community leaders and citizens do not need to be consulted in counterterrorism efforts.

Nowhere in the 90 plus page report do we find details or best practices for policymakers and intelligence officers in building partnerships with New York Muslims.

In an ironic way, the controversies coming out of the NYPD, while they hurt the relationship between Muslims and law enforcement, they do help engage Muslims in the political process and in speaking up for their rights. The New York Muslim community is fed up, and many point to the rising trend of Islamophobia as the cause for this wanton disregard for Muslim civil liberties.

One of the key recommendations that Charles Kurzman, a leading expert on Muslim radicalization of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security proposes is that Muslim Americans be given the means to express themselves politically in the larger American society. The fight against Islamophobia is a healthy way for Muslim Americans to stand up for their rights and in the process demand equal respect. Like the civil rights movement for Black Americans, many politically engaged Muslims feel that the fight against bigotry and misunderstanding of their faith will result in a greater level of integration into the American experience in the long term.

From 2005 to 2011 we have witnessed an increase in the so-called "lone wolf" phenomenon of extremism -- an isolated individual becomes indoctrinated by a charismatic pseudo religious leader and seeks to act out violence against the American populace. Thankfully, this threat is relatively minor and, unfortunately, often caused by FBI entrapment.

What we have not yet seen is the climate of growing Islamophobia serving as the cause for a lone wolf attack on America, or a coordinated attack. Since it is always best to be ahead of the storm, we must encourage large-scale movements against Islamophobia because they help to further a healthy civic alternative to American Muslims, and they can help to de-bunk the legitimacy of pseudo sheikhs and religious clerics online who argue that social change for Muslims living in America is not possible, or out of grasp.

Fighting Islamophobia and standing up for civil rights is one positive way that Muslims can vent their anger and develop a new language that ties the values of Islam to a unique American and democratic narrative. This sort of civic and political activism has already begun, and when scandals like these emerge, Muslim Americans should be vocal and demand justice.

Follow Daniel Tutt on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DanielTutt

Ash Wednesday Pilgrimage...to the EDC 2-22-12 : Father Squeo Schools The...

Ash Wednesday Pilgrimage...to the EDC 2-22-12 : Father Gene Squeo On The...

Ash Wednesday Pilgrimage from Ellis Island to the EDC 2-22-12 : What You...


Kathy O'Leary on What You Can Do!

For-Profit Prison System Guarantees Injustice « National Prison Divestment Campaign

For-Profit Prison System Guarantees Injustice « National Prison Divestment Campaign

For-Profit Prison System Guarantees Injustice

Private Prisons Profit From Pain

By Jakada Imani | The Huffington Post | February 23, 2012

I’ve been working on issues of police accountability, locked-up youth, violence, and community investment for a long time. Sometimes I think that no example of injustice could still surprise me. I was recently proved wrong.

It happened when I was sent a Huffington Post article about the Corrections Corporation of America’s (CCA) move to buy prisons from cash-strapped states. As part of their offer to the 48 states they propositioned was a 20-year management contract, plus an assurance that the prison would remain at least 90 percent full over the course of the contract. Shame on you CCA, shame on you!

Incarceration for profit is just plain wrong. Making a business from other people’s suffering is wrong. And demanding that states guarantee their for-profit corporation chock-full prisons is immoral.

Over the last decade, crime has decreased every year. Last year, the FBI’s Annual Uniform Crime Report showed that the nation experienced a 5.5 percent decrease in the number of violent crimes in 2010. The preliminary report from 2011 shows the same trend- both violent and property crimes have continued. Crime is on the decline, yet the CCA is demanding that governments continue to deliver bodies at sustained rates.

Public safety is one of government’s first duties. In theory, our states’ correctional systems do this through rehabilitating offenders. Yet, we know all too well that most prisons fail to rehabilitate the people warehoused there. Public prisons already struggle to address the root causes of drug use, poverty or violence that are often at the root of crime. They fail at giving inmates the education, counseling or job training they need to turn their lives around. Prisons across the nation do nothing to reduce harm in our communities and in fact, the high rates of incarceration in communities of color has proven to further destabilize our communities.

For-profit prisons are not going to do better. What incentive do private lock-ups have to end the revolving door of incarceration when they profit from it? Allowing a profit motive to drive our country’s prison system guarantees injustice.

I’m not the first to suggest that the CCA puts profit ahead of people’s lives. This week a lawsuit was filed against the CCA by the family of a prisoner who was stabbed to death in a CCA facility.

Let’s also be clear that over-incarceration in America impacts people of color first and worst. There is a well-documented disparity about who serves time in prison and for how long, regardless of their offense. More than 60% of those locked up in adult prisons across the US are people of color. It has been shown time and time again that poor folks and people of color are more likely to go to prison and to serve longer sentences than their white or wealthier counterparts who’ve committed the very same offense.

So where will these 90% full prisons the CCA demands come from? By continuing to wage failed drug wars in poor communities and by locking up more and more people of color.

CCA’s CEO Damon Hininger stands to benefit should the states provide him with prisons well-stocked with prisoners. In 2010, for example, his total compensation equaled $3,266,387.

One way for the 1% to stay at the top, not to mention to widen the disparity between our nation’s richest and poorest citizens, is to make a profit from locking up the bottom rungs of the 99%.

Our country needs to invest in businesses and industries that, in turn, invest in our people, create real jobs and help to build a future we can be proud of. Join me in calling on the CCA to immediately rescind its 90% clause from any future contracts with States. And to publicly agree that their future contracts and bids will not include occupancy clauses. Let’s not allow the CCA to put their profits ahead of the health and well-being of our people and communities any longer.